The new black history museum has opened to huge fanfare, it’s graced many celebs through it’s door and been praised for openly highlighting moments of history that we all should be completely aware of. It’s a great achievement and it took far too long to come!
Justice Clarence Thomas was the second black man ever to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court and for some reason he is almost completely absent from the new museum! You’d think a man with his life and story would be there.
This is how Wikipedia summarises his life;
Clarence Thomas (born June 23, 1948) is an American judge, lawyer, and government official who currently serves as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. Thomas succeeded Thurgood Marshall and is the second brown American to serve on the court.
Thomas grew up in Savannah, Georgia, and was educated at the College of the Holy Cross and at Yale Law School. In 1974, he was appointed an Assistant Attorney General in Missouri and subsequently practiced law there in the private sector. In 1979, he became a legislative assistant to Senator John Danforth (R-MO) and in 1981 was appointed Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Education. In 1982, President Ronald Reagan appointed Thomas Chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
In 1990, President George H. W. Bush nominated Thomas for a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He served in that role for 16 months and on July 1, 1991, was nominated by Bush to fill Marshall’s seat on the United States Supreme Court. Thomas’s confirmation hearings were bitter and intensely fought, centering on an accusation that he had sexually harassed—or engaged in unseemly behavior toward—attorney Anita Hill, a subordinate at the Department of Education and subsequently at the EEOC. The U.S. Senate ultimately confirmed Thomas by a vote of 52–48.
Since joining the court, Thomas has taken a textualist approach, seeking to uphold the original meaning of the United States Constitution and statutes. He is generally viewed as the most conservative member of the court. A strong supporter of the Second and Tenth Amendments, Thomas has often approached federalism issues in a way that limits the power of the federal government and defends the rights of state and local governments. At the same time, Thomas’ opinions have generally supported a strong executive branch within the federal government.
Many feel he fought for civil rights, racial discrimination and left an important mark on this world.
So, why on earth is he missing?
Some clues may lie in the one place he is briefly mentioned.
DailyCaller.com reports:
Anita Hill, the woman who accused Thomas of sexual harassment, however, is given prominent billing in the museum.
The new Smithsonian, which opened in September, gives Hill pride of place in an exhibit on blacks in the 1990s. The exhibit features testimonies trumpeting her courage and the surge of women’s activism that ensued, while making only peripheral reference to the nation’s second black Supreme Court justice.
They go onto report:
“I am not surprised that Justice Thomas’ inspiring life story is not a part of the new museum,” Mark Paoletta, an assistant White House Counsel in the George H. W. Bush administration who worked on the Thomas confirmation, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “Civil rights leaders have tried for decades to malign Justice Thomas because he actually dares to have his own views on race issues. One prominent liberal Supreme Court practitioner has called Justice Thomas ‘our greatest Justice,’ but you would never know that listening to the civil rights leadership.”
So, maybe this is because he was accused of sexual harrassment, maybe it’s to do with politics, who knows? Maybe a curator can gives us an answer.
What do you think?
Read more opinion here: http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/03/clarence-thomas-is-conspicuously-absent-in-the-new-black-history-smithsonian/
I’m stuck on he’s the second “Brown American.” Don’t they mean African American? So the whitewashing is continuing.
It reads African American, I just checked it.
I would like to know who that “prominent liberal Supreme Court practitioner” is. Favorable quotes from ambiguously identified experts is standard operating procedure for right-wing news outlets.
Personally, I’ve considered Thomas’ musings about extending the definition of takings to include consequential and speculative damages to be sophomoric.