First, checking the stats:

FBI’s “Top 10 Most Wanted” – 6 White; 4 Hispanic/Latino

FBI’s “Top 10 Most Wanted Terrorists” – 9 Arab/Islamic; 1 Black

FBI’s “Top 10 Most Wanted for Crimes Against Children” – 1 Black; 5 White: 4 Hispanic/Latino

FBI’s “Top 10 Most Wanted for Violent Crimes/Murder” – 2 Black; 6 Hispanic/Latino; 1 Arab; 1 White

FBI’s “Top 10 Most Wanted for Parental Kidnappings” – 2 Arab; 1 Hispanic/Latino; 7 White

FBI’s “Top 10 Most Wanted for ‘white collar’ crimes” – 8 White; 1 Hispanic/Latino; 1 Asian

FBI’s “Top Most Wanted for (a) Detonating Explosives in a public area; (b) Homicide/Serial Rape; (c) Hate Crime; (d) Attempted Child Abduction; (e) Bus Bombing; (f) Abduction; (g) Couple of Unsolved Murders and Bombings, highly unlikely a Black person is behind it” – Every single one of them white, but not all from the United States.

Note: Out of 70 on the FBI’s Top 10, only four are ‘recognizably’ Black or African/American. On the average, less than 6 (six-) percent of these Most Wanted and Most Violent are Black or African-American.

White America needs to take a long hard look at itself.

For a sub-sector of folk who continually gun down unarmed Black people who have committed no crime, or very seldom commit crimes worthy of the death penalty that too often comes without a TRIAL BY JURY, it is relatively safe to say that more than half of the Black Americans accused of crimes or convicted of crimes are either completely innocent, or got a sentence that was nowhere close to fitting the actual crime.

 

This kind of violence in the Black community is Black folks “acting white.” We (our people) learned it from the most insidiously violent race on the planet. We were never stuck on stupid like this until some time after integration. A Black person would break out from time to time and do something ishty, but it wasn’t a daily CONSTANT until segregation ended:

***

On the OTHER hand, are Black people the most victimized race in the nation? Check out the FBI Data for 2012:

Incidents and Offenses

The Uniform Crime Reporting Program collects data about both single-bias and multiple-bias hate crimes. For each offense type reported, law enforcement must indicate at least one bias motivation. A single-bias incident is defined as an incident in which one or more offense types are motivated by the same bias. A multiple-bias incident is defined as an incident in which more than one offense type occurs and at least two offense types are motivated by different biases.

• In 2012, 1,730 law enforcement agencies reported 5,796 hate crime incidents involving 6,718 offenses.
• There were 5,790 single-bias incidents that involved 6,705 offenses, 7,151 victims, and 5,322 offenders.
• The 6 multiple­-bias incidents reported in 2012 involved 13 offenses, 13 victims, and 9 offenders.

Single-bias incidents

Analysis of the 5,790 single-bias incidents reported in 2012 revealed that:

• 48.3 percent were racially motivated.
• 19.6 percent resulted from sexual-orientation bias.
• 19.0 percent were motivated by religious bias.
• 11.5 percent stemmed from ethnicity/national origin bias.
• 1.6 percent were prompted by disability bias.

Offenses by bias motivation within incidents

Of the 6,705 single-bias hate crime offenses reported in the above incidents:

• 49.2 percent stemmed from racial bias.
• 19.7 percent were motivated by sexual-orientation bias.
• 17.4 percent resulted from religious bias.
• 12.3 percent were prompted by ethnicity/national origin bias.
• 1.5 percent resulted from biases against disabilities.

Racial bias

In 2012, law enforcement agencies reported that 3,297 single-bias hate crime offenses were racially motivated. Of these offenses:

• 66.1 percent were motivated by anti-black bias.
• 22.4 percent stemmed from anti-white bias.
• 4.1 percent resulted from anti-Asian/Pacific Islander bias.
• 4.1 percent were a result of bias against groups of individuals consisting of more than one race (anti-multiple races, group).
• 3.3 percent were motivated by anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native bias.

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,166 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-biased offenses showed:

• 59.7 percent were anti-Jewish.
• 12.8 percent were anti-Islamic.
• 7.6 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
• 6.8 percent were anti-Catholic.
• 2.9 percent were anti-Protestant.
• 1.0 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.
• 9. 2 percent were anti-other (unspecified) religion.

Sexual-orientation bias

In 2012, law enforcement agencies reported 1,318 hate crime offenses based on sexual-orientation bias. Of these offenses:

• 54.6 percent were classified as anti-male homosexual bias.
• 28.0 percent were reported as anti-homosexual bias.
• 12.3 percent were prompted by an anti-female homosexual bias.
• 3.1 percent were classified as anti-bisexual bias.
• 2.0 percent were the result of an anti-heterosexual bias.

Ethnicity/national origin bias

Of the single-bias incidents, 822 offenses were committed based on the offenders’ bias toward the perceived ethnicity or national origin of the victim. Of these offenses:

• 59.4 percent were anti-Hispanic bias.
• 40.6 percent were anti-other ethnicity/national origin bias.

Disability bias

There were 102 reported hate crime offenses committed based on disability bias. Of these:

• 82 offenses were classified as anti-mental disability.
• 20 offenses were reported as anti-physical disability.

By victim type

When considering the type of victims among the reported 6,718 hate crime offenses:

• 79.6 percent were directed at individuals.
• 4.6 percent were against businesses or financial institutions.
• 3.0 percent were against society.
• 2.9 percent were against government.
• 2.7 percent were against religious organizations.
• The remaining 7.2 percent were directed at other, multiple, or unknown victim types.